Real or Fake?
A daily game comparing authentic and manipulated health content. It trains the eye on fake authority, fabricated testimonials and synthetic media.
Check it before you trust or share it.
Health misinformation reaches young people in Benin before they go looking for it. Loupe answers it inside the apps they already use — WhatsApp, Messenger, Instagram — and in public, under the post itself.
Pilot in Benin · In French, with Fon and Yoruba audio
The problem
0%
She is twenty, in Cotonou, scrolling between two classes. A woman in a white coat says, with total confidence, that contraception leaves young women sterile. That evening a friend forwards her the same video. She stops her contraception, and asks no one.
Nothing in that started with a question. The claim found her.
Why now
0%
of citizens worldwide are worried about the impact of online disinformationUNESCO / IPSOS, 2023
0%
of Beninese get news regularly through social media — eight times more than in 2014Afrobarometer, 2026
0
young Beninese were trained as fact-checkers by WHO and UNFPA in 2022, reaching 2,000 peersWHO Africa, 2022
Benin has already used youth and social media against health misinformation — during one epidemic. Loupe extends that approach to the everyday: contraception, infections, miracle cures, self-medication.
How it works
Step one
A message, a screenshot, a voice note or a video goes to Loupe — on WhatsApp, or in the Messenger, Instagram or Facebook inbox they were already in. Nothing to install, no website to visit, no account to create.
Step two
The answer comes back in your own private chat with Loupe, in plain language. No percentages, no scores. Loupe never enters the conversation the content came from, and the friend who sent it is never notified.
Step three
When our verified library of WHO and Benin health-authority sources covers the claim, the verdict cites it. When it does not, the verdict says so plainly and sends you to a health professional.
Or, in public
Forwarding is private, and nobody is told. But a young person can instead tag Loupe in a comment under a Facebook or Instagram post, and Loupe answers in that comment thread — so everyone who saw the claim reads the verdict too. One rumour, answered once, for everybody.
It answers no health questions. It gives no diagnosis and no treatment advice. It takes a claim that has already reached a young person and says whether it is reliable — and why.
We asked first
Share of 46 respondents naming each platform. Multiple answers allowed.
One respondent in forty-six found health information through a search engine. Forty-three found it on WhatsApp.
would use a free tool that tells them whether a health claim is reliable, and why
have already shared health information without checking it
say a simple explanation is what would help most — ahead of everything else
Asked what would help most, the first answer was not more information. It was a simple explanation. So every verdict is written in plain language.
How a verdict is built
Searches a curated library of WHO and Benin health-authority documents, selected and validated by our Health Content Lead, and collects the passages relevant to the claim.
Drafts the verdict in plain language from those passages, and cites them. When the library holds nothing on the claim, it says so explicitly rather than guessing.
Verifies that every statement is supported by a cited passage, that every source exists, and that nothing drifted into diagnosis or treatment advice. A draft that fails is rewritten once.
Verification is the entry point
A daily game comparing authentic and manipulated health content. It trains the eye on fake authority, fabricated testimonials and synthetic media.
One tap brings a friend, or a trained peer educator, into the conversation. Human judgment alongside the AI. You always decide.
Trained youth ambassadors run sessions in universities, youth centres and community spaces, and recruit the next ambassadors.
Anonymised claims let us see the same rumour arriving again and again. We publish a short public warning for each one, so a viral falsehood becomes a collective lesson.
The day a young person checks the next claim without us, we have done our job.
Safety and privacy
Loupe assesses whether a claim is reliable. Whenever a claim touches a symptom, a medication or an emergency, it advises consulting a health professional.
Content is defined by our Health Content Lead, trained in general medicine, and reviewed weekly by three confirmed health professionals from the Comè health zone.
Messages, images, voice notes and phone numbers are used to produce the verdict, then discarded. WhatsApp users need no account.
A checked claim is reduced to a short neutral statement, stripped of names and identifying detail, and linked to no user. That is what lets us spot recurring rumours.
Loupe says clearly when it is uncertain, and never presents a verdict as medical certainty. Any user can flag a verdict in one tap.
Trained peer educators sign a code of conduct covering confidentiality, the boundary against medical advice, and a named referral point.
Our data handling is advised by
They advise on data minimisation, on encryption in transit and at rest, and on how the messages, images and voice notes people send us are handled — the areas where a service like ours can do the most harm if it is built carelessly.
Six-month pilot
young people reached
health claims verified
trained peer educators
peer workshops delivered
Progress is measured by a short diagnostic taken before and after each cycle — and by how far young people get in the game without our help, which is the only honest test of whether they need us less.
Who builds it
Team Lead & Full-Stack Developer
ENSGMM, UNSTIM
AI & Data Engineer
ENSGMM, UNSTIM
Community Manager
ENSGMM, UNSTIM
Statistician
ENSPD, Université de Parakou
Health Content Lead
Faculté de Médecine, Université de Parakou
Our health content is reviewed by